programming (AOP) have in common.
I went through a very interesting paper about AOP and Java Dynamic Proxies. I’ll have to look at JBoss AOP to find out how it is implemented.
I am a Red Hat principal software engineer. I currently work on AMQP/Qpid. Prior to that I was am IT Architect working for IPT an European systems integrator based in Switzerland. Before that I was leading the Message Service Team for Arjuna Technologies Limited, a spin-off from Hewlett-Packard where I was a senior research and development engineer. I obtained my PhD in Computing Science from INRIA and completed research posts at both INRIA and Newcastle University.
I went through a very interesting paper about AOP and Java Dynamic Proxies. I’ll have to look at JBoss AOP to find out how it is implemented.
I have eventually found a good explaination on why this is a very bad idea to use SOAP encoding. SOAP encoding only exists for historical reasons. The SOAP authors didn’t initially have access to XSD so they wrote the SOAP encoding rules, which explain how to serialize an instance of the SOAP data model to a SOAP message. It was left to SOAP implementers to map their own technologies to the SOAP data model. When you create a WSDL binding, you have to specify whether the SOAP messages contain literal or encoded instances of the schema constructs the operations use. If you choose "literal," you are saying that the XML Schema constructs your WSDL definitions refer to are concrete specifications of what will appear in your SOAP message bodies. If you choose "encoded," you are saying that the XML Schema constructs your WSDL definitions refer to are abstract specifications of what will appear in your SOAP message bodies; these can be made concrete by applying the rules defined by SOAP encoding.
I am just back from a fantastic trip in Scotland. I went there with a friend of mine with the intension to play golf and visit distilleries and so we did!